On Sunday, 10 June 2007 15:17, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 12:58 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > This is the resume part, or at least it seems so, but the above one is a
> > suspend callback. If I understand it correctly, this one replaces
> > hpet_resume(), but is it sufficient for the suspend part too?
>
> Oops. Sorry, misunderstood you. Yeah, it's intentional. It gets reset on
> power off and we have not seen any problems with this yet.
OK, I wouldn't do it in this patch, though.
IMO it's a bit more than the changelog says and we'll lose the track record of
this change if it goes like this. Would that be possible to separate it?
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
