Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 03:27:43PM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> SCENARIO 1:
> 
> Program Thread:   Library Thread:
>                   fd = socket(AF_*, SOCK_*, 0);
> fork();
>                   int x = FD_CLOEXEC;
>                   fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, &x);

BTW, regardless of anything else, in such situation this "library
thread" would be better off by just having independent descriptors.
We _can_ do that just fine.

That is, if library code using such stuff would be OK with being a thread.
Any specific examples one way or another?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux