Hi. On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 00:54 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Sat 2007-06-09 15:16:04, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-06-09 15:08:17 +0200, Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Starting beeper as soon as ACPI sleep returns is very useful in > > > debugging "apparently dead" machines. If it beeps at all, it makes > > > sense to start playing with CMOS tracer. > > > > I'd even go so far and implement it unconditionally. > > Well, try it; it is too annoying to be unconditional. Could you modify the pitch or the length then, to make it less annoying? It sounds like a really good idea to me. Regards, Nigel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
- References:
- [BUG] acpi double resume and fail
- From: Christian Leber <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] acpi double resume and fail
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
- From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]>
- Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- [BUG] acpi double resume and fail
- Prev by Date: Re: AppArmor FAQ
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- Previous by thread: Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
- Next by thread: Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
- Index(es):
 |