Re: [PATCH 2/7] Replace DPRINTK with pr_debug in alternative.c

Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> , rendering "debug-alternative" option useless.

So drop the patch entirely or change the DPRINTK macro to use pr_debug?

Jack
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/7] Cleanup code to replace DPRINTK with pr_debug
    • From: Jack Stone <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Cleanup code to replace DPRINTK with pr_debug
    • From: Jack Stone <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 2/7] Replace DPRINTK with pr_debug in alternative.c
    • From: Jack Stone <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/7] Replace DPRINTK with pr_debug in alternative.c
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/7] Add pr_debug_pid to kernel.h
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.21 numa policy and huge pages not working
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/7] Replace DPRINTK with pr_debug in alternative.c
• Next by thread: [PATCH 3/7] Replace DPRINTK with pr_debug in autofs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]