Re: [PATCH 2/7] Replace DPRINTK with pr_debug in alternative.c

Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> , rendering "debug-alternative" option useless.

So drop the patch entirely or change the DPRINTK macro to use pr_debug?

Jack
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 0/7] Cleanup code to replace DPRINTK with pr_debug
  - From: Jack Stone <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] Cleanup code to replace DPRINTK with pr_debug
  - From: Jack Stone <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/7] Replace DPRINTK with pr_debug in alternative.c
  - From: Jack Stone <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/7] Replace DPRINTK with pr_debug in alternative.c
  - From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/7] Add pr_debug_pid to kernel.h
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.21 numa policy and huge pages not working
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/7] Replace DPRINTK with pr_debug in alternative.c
Next by thread: [PATCH 3/7] Replace DPRINTK with pr_debug in autofs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]