> Anyway the patch I sent is simple enough, and if users end up demanding
> the ability to better deal with exclusive cpusets, the patch will be
> simple enough to extend by changing cpuset_auto_setup(), so let's
> stick with that patch since it's your preference (IIUC).
Yeah - probably so.
When someone gets serious about things like checkpoint, restart, and
migrate functionality, based on this container cloning, working with
cpusets, they will probably have to revisit this interaction with
exclusive cpusets.
Perhaps a comment could be put in the code, saying something like the
above, so whomever does this will realize they are traveling in
unchartered territory.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/8] RSS controller based on process containers (v3.1)
- Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
- Index(es):
 |