On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 04:28:49PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:44:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Then again, it's a better strategy than trying to read the code ;)
> >
> > Please, tell us what it does, so that we can decide whether we want it in
> > Linux.
>
> It does the same as cleanfile.pl.
> I have seen no reason to replace cleanfile.pl with this version.
It does better whitespace cleanup, than
scripts/{cleanfile *and* cleanpatch}
togather with more user, operating system kernel-friendly approach.
Please, test it on proposed testcase - ipv6.h, and you will see, what i'm
talking about. Patch description + script name is all one must to know to
start use it *safely*.
> Linecount is down but so is maintainability / extendability.
Really? If you think so...
For those, who have (X)emacs on board, i recommend "develock.el" as
good damage-showing tool.
Sorry, Andrew, for garbage in you patch subject filters :)
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
