On Thu, 7 June 2007 15:59:00 -0700, Jared Hulbert wrote:
>
> Gee I think it seems logfs would be a better choice. Jffs2 and
> ubifs(jffs3) for that matter combine node and node header in series
> which means your data nodes aren't aligned to page boundarys. Logfs
> nodes could be more easily aligned.
That used to be the case before I did a format change. Compression
pretty much requires a format very similar to JFFS2. The alternative
would be _huge_ complexity.
However, it would be possible to create specialized XIP segments with
the old page-aligned format. Supporting two kinds of segment format is
still simpler than supporting compression with the old format.
Jörn
--
With a PC, I always felt limited by the software available. On Unix,
I am limited only by my knowledge.
-- Peter J. Schoenster
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
