On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 09:02:14 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 05:53:42PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Looks correct. However I am curious what this "i2c->id" is supposed to
> > represent, given that I2C devices do not have any form of ID as PCI or
> > USB devices have. No driver uses "MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ...)"
> > probably just because it doesn't make sense. So, rather than fixing
> > this, shouldn't we simply wipe out struct i2c_device_id? Greg, David?
>
> If no one is using it, then yes, it should be removed.
>
> Sorry, I added it a while ago thinking it was going to be used (I had
> test patches using it in my tree, but they never worked out in the end.)
OK. Geert, care to submit a new patch removing struct i2c_device_id
altogether?
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
