Re: [patch 03/54] NOHZ: Rate limit the local softirq pending warning output

Chris Wright wrote:
> -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> ---------------------
> 
> From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> 
> The warning in the NOHZ code, which triggers when a CPU goes idle with
> softirqs pending can fill up the logs quite quickly.  Rate limit the output
> until we found the root cause of that problem.

Isn't the root cause found and fixed with "[patch 09/54] Prevent going
idle with softirq pending"?

- Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 03/54] NOHZ: Rate limit the local softirq pending warning output
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 00/54] 2.6.21-stable review
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • [patch 03/54] NOHZ: Rate limit the local softirq pending warning output
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: O_CLOEXEC: An alternate proposal
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 03/54] NOHZ: Rate limit the local softirq pending warning output
• Previous by thread: [patch 03/54] NOHZ: Rate limit the local softirq pending warning output
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 03/54] NOHZ: Rate limit the local softirq pending warning output
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]