Re: [patch 03/54] NOHZ: Rate limit the local softirq pending warning output

Chris Wright wrote:
> -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> ---------------------
> 
> From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> 
> The warning in the NOHZ code, which triggers when a CPU goes idle with
> softirqs pending can fill up the logs quite quickly.  Rate limit the output
> until we found the root cause of that problem.

Isn't the root cause found and fixed with "[patch 09/54] Prevent going
idle with softirq pending"?

- Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 03/54] NOHZ: Rate limit the local softirq pending warning output
  - From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch 00/54] 2.6.21-stable review
  - From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- [patch 03/54] NOHZ: Rate limit the local softirq pending warning output
  - From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: O_CLOEXEC: An alternate proposal
Next by Date: Re: [patch 03/54] NOHZ: Rate limit the local softirq pending warning output
Previous by thread: [patch 03/54] NOHZ: Rate limit the local softirq pending warning output
Next by thread: Re: [patch 03/54] NOHZ: Rate limit the local softirq pending warning output
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]