William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>>> !CONFIG_X86_PAE && CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G doesn't make sense and is not allowed
>>> by this patch. CONFIG_X86_PAE && !CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G works here.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 08:38:22PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> But what's the point?
>> If you're going to divorce these, at least do it in a way that makes
>> sense, specifically the two independent variables are PAE and HIGHMEM.
>> PAE and !HIGHMEM does make (some amount of) sense, due to no kmap overhead.
>
> Beg your pardon? Are you reading the patch description correctly?
>
I mean, with your patch CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G versus CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G really
don't make sense as separate selections anymore.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
