On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> Looks good to me. Do you think we need to do something about the DRM
> notifier thingy too ?
No. I think that anybody who uses that gets whatever he deserves. It's
designed for one particular usage scenario (where it should work fine), if
you try to use it for something else across threads, you've already lost.
> Oh and Roland patch doesn't prevent signalfd() from stealing synchronous
> signals such as SIGSEGV etc... which I think would result in random
> behaviour.... do you want a patch for that or we just consider it broken
> API usage and let it as it is ?
I think Davide ack'ed your patch, but I also think that one clashes with
the one I actually ended up applying. If you were to send me the signalfd
part (tested, preferably), I'd apply it, considering that it seems to be
the right thign to do, and it already got acked by Davide.
Or did I get confused by some other patches flying around?
(Gaah, there's been _way_ too much patching going on today, I'm not happy
about how -rc4 seems to not be calming down)
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
