Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs

On Thursday, June 7, 2007 5:20:50 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > -unsigned int *usage_table;
> > +unsigned int usage_table[NUM_VAR_RANGES];
> >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(mtrr_mutex);
>
> didn't it feel all dirty when you had to do that?

Hey, this was already there... I didn't want to rewrite the whole thing at 
once. :)  Patch looks fine though.

Thanks,
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
  - From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] intel-rng: Undo mess made by an 80 column extremist
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm2: Assigning IP address fails
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]