Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs

On Thursday, June 7, 2007 5:20:50 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > -unsigned int *usage_table;
> > +unsigned int usage_table[NUM_VAR_RANGES];
> >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(mtrr_mutex);
>
> didn't it feel all dirty when you had to do that?

Hey, this was already there... I didn't want to rewrite the whole thing at 
once. :)  Patch looks fine though.

Thanks,
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
    • From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] intel-rng: Undo mess made by an 80 column extremist
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm2: Assigning IP address fails
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]