On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:16:21 -0500
Anton Blanchard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > zap_other_threads() requires tasklist_lock.
> >
> > If we're going to do this then we should probably create some new function
> > (with a better name) which takes tasklsit_lock and then calls
> > zap_other_threads().
> >
> > Does this patch fix any observed-in-the-real-world problem? If so, please
> > describe it.
>
> Yeah we have had complaints where threaded apps have only one thread
> shot down instead of the entire process. This leaves the application in
> a bad state, whereas if it had been killed cleanly the application could
> have restarted.
>
> My understanding is that fatal signals should kill all threads in the
> group.
>
OK, well could we please get all that info appropriatelt captured in #2's
changelog?
Other architectures will probably need to implement this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
