On 6/7/07, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 11:33:12 -0700
"Miles Lane" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andrew, is it okay to debug this with the MM tree? I see this with
> Linus' kernels as well. It's a long-standing issue, but I have always
> just used pci=assign-busses in the past.
>
Dunno, but let's not miss an opportunity to bug the PCI maintainer.
>
> [ 0.215128] PCI: Transparent bridge - 0000:00:1e.0
> [ 0.215142] PCI: Scanning behind PCI bridge 0000:02:09.0, config
> 000000, pass 0
> [ 0.215158] PCI: Scanning behind PCI bridge 0000:02:09.0, config
> 000000, pass 1
> [ 0.215184] PCI: Bus #03 (-#06) is hidden behind transparent bridge
> #02 (-#02) (try 'pci=assign-busses')
> [ 0.215187] Please report the result to linux-kernel to fix this permanently
> [ 0.215192] PCI: Bus scan for 0000:02 returning with max=06
> [ 0.215199] PCI: Scanning behind PCI bridge 0000:00:1e.0, config
> 020200, pass 1
> [ 0.215209] PCI: Bus scan for 0000:00 returning with max=06
>
Does the kernel otherwise work OK with and without pci=assign-busses?
(Crud! GMail likes to send stuff "Reply to Sender" with its default
UI. Whoops.)
As far as I can tell. I play with this build some more without adding
that kernel boot parameter.
Miles
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]