[PATCH] Make smp_call_function{_single} go WARNING and return -EINVAL on !SMP (was Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64: NMI watchdog: Protect smp_call_function() within CONFIG_SMP)

["Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>]

On 6/7/07, Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
> BTW: smp_call_function() simply returns 0 and
> smp_call_function_single() simply returns -EBUSY when !SMP.
> These appear to be just some ad hoc values. IMHO, we should
> be going BUG() in both these cases because "other" CPUs for
> !SMP are undefined / meaningless.

79974a0e4c6be6e9a3717b4c5a5d5c44c36b1653 from a couple
weeks back (discussed on http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/14/68 i.e.
[patch] Let smp_call_function_single return -EBUSY.) introduced
this behaviour. [ Adding Heiko Carstens, Andrew and David Miller
to Cc: list. ]

I realized a warning would be more appropriate for this case than
a BUG at the last moment ... this doesn't quite meet Linus' "You
killed my father; prepare to die!" criterion :-)

---

The smp_call_function{_single} functions are used to run
given function on all {or speicified} *other* CPUs. For
UP systems, "other" CPUs simply don't exist, so we flag
such incorrect usage of these functions using a WARNING.

Also, -EBUSY is generally returned by arch implementations
when they find that target_cpu == current_cpu, which is not
a comparable case to the !SMP case. Use -EINVAL instead,
similar to what powerpc does for !cpu_online(target), which
is somewhat more analogous.

Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <ssatyam@cse.iitk.ac.in>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

---

include/linux/smp.h |   15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

---

diff -ruNp a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h
--- a/include/linux/smp.h	2007-06-07 12:46:50.000000000 +0530
+++ b/include/linux/smp.h	2007-06-07 21:13:29.000000000 +0530
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 *		Alan Cox. <alan@redhat.com>
 */

+#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>

extern void cpu_idle(void);
@@ -84,11 +85,6 @@ void smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void);
 *	These macros fold the SMP functionality into a single CPU system
 */
#define raw_smp_processor_id()			0
-static inline int up_smp_call_function(void)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-#define smp_call_function(func,info,retry,wait)	(up_smp_call_function())
#define on_each_cpu(func,info,retry,wait)	\
	({					\
		local_irq_disable();		\
@@ -99,10 +95,17 @@ static inline int up_smp_call_function(v
static inline void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu) { }
#define num_booting_cpus()			1
#define smp_prepare_boot_cpu()			do {} while (0)
+static inline int smp_call_function(void (*func)(void *info),
+				    void *info, int retry, int wait)
+{
+	WARN_ON(1);
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
static inline int smp_call_function_single(int cpuid, void (*func)
(void *info),
					   void *info, int retry, int wait)
{
-	return -EBUSY;
+	WARN_ON(1);
+	return -EINVAL;
}

#endif /* !SMP */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/