Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/7/07, Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:27:46PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> [...]
> I'm not sure it's appropriate for -rc5 since it mucks around with some
> early boot ordering, but I'll leave that to Andi, since it does address
> some real bugs people have been seeing.

I don't think the patch is suitable for merging at this time. Perhaps
if it survives some time in -mm* / 2.6.23* it could be backported
in a later 2.6.22 stable release. But right now it definitely
needs more testing and addressing of my review comments.

BTW an unrelated/happy side-effect of the patch is that it removes
the zero-size-guilty kmalloc()'s from the mtrr code. -mm does have
some fixes that prevent those zero-size allocations, which could
likely be retired if this gets merged in? ...

[ On another unrelated note, could someone tell me who maintains
i386? I've looked around, but surprisingly can't seem to find
anybody listed anywhere. ]

Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux