On 6/7/07, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:11 +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> Your code now looks nice and clean. But I don't know what you want. I
> already spent lot of time on version 7 I posted and contains all those
> corrections which were suggested for my earlier version. I cannot ask
> you to look into possible problems (if any) in my code now since you
> are not interested in that anyway. So, please continue this
> duplication.
What I (and others) repeatedly asked for was an explanation of why there
were the differences between the bytecode from your version and the
bytecode from mine. This was never explained by you and I was left to do
this myself. Sadly, doing so meant some duplication.
I don't know the reason for bytecode difference. I focused on making
sure that the C code is functionally identical to original code. I
never did a bytecode diff.
Anyhow, I think I can now explain the differences. Now we have two
versions, its a question of how to proceed. Basically one needs to be
merged into the other. I will try and compare the two patches and see
what differences we have.
Sounds good.
Regards,
Nitin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
