* Martin Peschke <[email protected]> wrote:
> Admittedly this gives you the top five contention points, [...]
if the infrastructure your are advocating does not allow us to keep the
existing output then it's simply not flexible enough. Why on earth are
you even arguing about this? A "cleanup" should not change the output,
simple as that. Do a patch that has the _same_ output and then we can
see whether it's a good patch. You made the same mistake with your
/proc/timer_stats cleanups. I dont like NACK-ing patches but you seem to
be missing the basic precondition of cleanups: no functional effect to
the code, and certainly no change in output.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
