On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 07 June 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > The sys_socketcall() system call has been also changed to support
> > a new SYS_SOCKET2 indentifier.
>
> I thought the general agreement was that sys_socketcall is a bad
> idea to start with. Is there any benefit in adding new calls to
> it instead of using a new system call number for sys_socket2 on
> all architectures?
Ohh, I didn't know it was flagged as "bad" ;) I actually had it that way,
but then I noticed there was no __NR_socket, so I complied to the
existing way of doing it.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
