On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 11:40:58AM -0700, Jared Hulbert wrote:
> > The embedded people already use them
> >on flash which is a little dumb, but now we add even more cludge for
> >a non-block based access.
>
> Please justify your assertion that using cramfs on flash is dumb.
> What would be not dumb? In an embedded system with addressable Flash
> the linear addressing cramfs is simple and elegant solution.
Have to agree with Jared here, cramfs is a perfectly sensible thing to
use on many platforms.
Adding the ability to make particular files XIP on those platforms is
also quite reasonable.
The alternative would be to add a whole new filesystem to the kernel
(effectively obsoleting cramfs) just to add XIP support or to compile
in a second filesystem (ext2 w/XIP) just for a few files.
Keeping cramfs as a simple example filesystem is really not all that
worthwhile, given it's not much of an example.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
