On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Michael Hanselmann wrote:
> > So the system is behaving the way you want, but not for the reason you
> > think. I bet you could remove the call to usb_root_hub_lost_power()
> > entirely and it wouldn't make any difference at all.
>
> Actually, that's true. René Nussbaumer tried without that call and it
> still works as intended. Should I leave that call out and drop the
> changes on usb_root_hub_lost_power for CONFIG_PM?
That would be best. usb_root_hub_lost_power() is really meant to be
used only when resuming from a suspend; it isn't appropriate for your
situation.
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
