Re: [patch] Kconfig.debug DEBUG_PREEMPT dependency

* maximilian attems <[email protected]> wrote:

> allow to set DEBUG_PREEMPT on PREEMPT_BKL, but !PREEMPT purpose is to 
> get bonus of debug_smp_processor_id().

hm, have you tested this? In the case of !PREEMPT there will be _lots_ 
of places that use smp_processor_id() but where the preempt_count() wont 
be elevated - causing false positive warnings.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] Kconfig.debug DEBUG_PREEMPT dependency
    • From: maximilian attems <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v15
• Next by Date: Re: [Patch 05/18] fs/logfs/logfs.h
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Kconfig.debug DEBUG_PREEMPT dependency
• Next by thread: Re: [REPOST PATCH] sata_promise: use TF interface for polling NODATA commands
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]