* maximilian attems <[email protected]> wrote:
> allow to set DEBUG_PREEMPT on PREEMPT_BKL, but !PREEMPT purpose is to
> get bonus of debug_smp_processor_id().
hm, have you tested this? In the case of !PREEMPT there will be _lots_
of places that use smp_processor_id() but where the preempt_count() wont
be elevated - causing false positive warnings.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
