>>> Keir Fraser <[email protected]> 06.06.07 10:54 >>>
>On 6/6/07 09:39, "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The issue is
>> that on that system, transition into ACPI mode takes over 600ms (SMM
>> execution, and hence no interrupts delivered during that time), and with
>> Xen using the PIT (PM timer support was added by Keir as a result of this,
>> but that doesn't cure the problem here, it just reduces the likelihood it'll
>> be encountered) platform time and local time got pretty much out of sync.
>
>If you have an ACPI PM timer in your system (and if you have SMM then your
>system is almost certainly modern enough to have one) then surely the
>problem is fixed for all practical purposes? The problem was overflow of a
>fixed-width platform counter. The PIT wraps every ~50ms, but the ACPI PM
>timer will wrap only every ~4s. It would be quite unreasonable for SMM to
>take the CPU away for multiple seconds, even as a one-time boot operation.
No, I don't think the problem's gone with the PM timer - it is just much less
likely. Since you depend on the TSC (which must generally be assumed be
unsyncronized across CPUs) and on the error correction factor (which shows
non-zero values every few seconds), getting the interpolated times on two
CPUs out of sync is still possible, and given the way the time keeping code
works even being off by just a single nanosecond may be fatal.
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
