David,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:52:19AM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > > > @@ -330,10 +330,22 @@
> > > > #define __NR_signalfd 305
> > > > #define __NR_timerfd 306
> > > > #define __NR_eventfd 307
> > > > +#define __NR_pfm_create_context 308
> > > > +#define __NR_pfm_write_pmcs (__NR_pfm_create_context+1)
> > > > +#define __NR_pfm_write_pmds (__NR_pfm_create_context+2)
> > > > +#define __NR_pfm_read_pmds (__NR_pfm_create_context+3)
> > > > +#define __NR_pfm_load_context (__NR_pfm_create_context+4)
> > > > +#define __NR_pfm_start (__NR_pfm_create_context+5)
> > > > +#define __NR_pfm_stop (__NR_pfm_create_context+6)
> > > > +#define __NR_pfm_restart (__NR_pfm_create_context+7)
> > > > +#define __NR_pfm_create_evtsets (__NR_pfm_create_context+8)
> > > > +#define __NR_pfm_getinfo_evtsets (__NR_pfm_create_context+9)
> > > > +#define __NR_pfm_delete_evtsets (__NR_pfm_create_context+10)
> > > > +#define __NR_pfm_unload_context (__NR_pfm_create_context+11)
> > > >
> > > > #ifdef __KERNEL__
> > > >
> > > > -#define __NR_syscalls 308
> > > > +#define __NR_syscalls 319
> > > >
> > >
> > > The highest numbered syscall, __NR_pfm_create_context+11, is 319 and
> > > __NR_syscalls is set to the same, which is wrong.
> > >
> > You mean, it is off by one, right? Should be 320, then.
> >
>
> Yes, and the same off by one problem exists in your i386 patch that adds
> the new syscalls as well.
Okay, I have fixed that now for powerpc, i386. Mips and IA-64 were fine.
Thanks.
--
-Stephane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]