Re: [5/5] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions

wonderful long list :)

the 2.6.22 is the next unstable developing tree, the 2.7 tree? When
not, then so be the stabilization kernel and so be 2.6.22-rcX (
X->1..15 ), and 0 regression.

/* sorry for the spelling, but I learn English not. */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [5/5] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions
    • From: Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: libata & no PCI: dma_[un]map_single undefined
• Next by Date: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions with patches
• Previous by thread: Re: [5/5] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions
• Next by thread: Re: [5/5] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]