Re: libata & no PCI: dma_[un]map_single undefined

[Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>]

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:56:08AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > NAK
> > > 
> > > We have generic devices and generic DMA mapping.  libata already uses
> > > the generic stuff.  Now fix the platform...
> > 
> > Nice theory but your generic helpers rely on the map functions working
> > even for generic hardware that doesn't need them, so at the very least
> > there is some clean up required.
> 
> Sure there is some clean up needed -- on the arch side.
> 
> Even !PCI dma_xxx wrappers that do nothing more than return a dma
> mapping error are a valid platform implementation.

If you don't have DMA capabilities, does libata still need ->pad and
->pad_dma set?

I had a problem where a pata_platform device which wasn't DMA capable
failed to initialise because we quite rightfully made dma_alloc_coherent()
fail (due to the DMA masks not being set.)

It seems odd that libata requires DMA memory for non-DMA capable devices...

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/