On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:19:59AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
[]
> > So, there are some new scripts. What if my proposition will be better,
> > so to speak? Any problems i'm willing to fix/enhance.
> >
> > Note: only one copy of the file required. Sym-linked name *diff* or
> > *patch* will process patches. I know, that symlinks in sources isn't
> > good, thus change "$0" -> "$1" will process first parameter.
>
> Sorry - but I really do not get your point here.
> Are you trying to say that current cleanpatch is not good enough
> or do you propose a new script to do something similar?
Better means, less bloated scripts in the source tree to make
userspace suck less...
> We do not want everyones favorite patch preprocessing script
> in the kernel. So the only option is to incorporate changes in
> cleanpatch.
I don't see scripts/clean* in .21, so decided, to make a hopefully
better, nicer unix-way and posix re-write, this morning.
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]