Re: [PATCH] stop x86 ->sysdata abuse; introduce pci_sysdata

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:05:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> This patch introduces struct pci_sysdata to x86 and x86-64, and
> converts the existing two users (NUMA, Calgary) to use it.
> 
> This eliminates the conflict between NUMA and Calgary using the same
> pointer for different uses, and lays the groundwork for adding x86
> PCI domain support.

Thanks for the patch. I am testing with Calgary and will push upstream
through the next batch of Calgary updates when it will be ready. At
the moment it doesn't boot on one of my test machines, I'm looking
into it.

Also, FWIW, we don't use the same pointer for different uses (that
wouldn't have worked, obviously) but I've never been 100% comfortable
with the hack we use and this is obviously the right thing to do.

Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] stop x86 ->sysdata abuse; introduce pci_sysdata
    • From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Calgary updates for 2.6.23
    • From: [email protected]
  • [PATCH 1/15] x86-64: Calgary - generalize calgary_increase_split_completion_timeout
    • From: [email protected]
  • [PATCH 2/15] x86-64: Calgary - update copyright notice
    • From: [email protected]
  • [PATCH 3/15] x86-64: Calgary - introduce handle_quirks() for various chipset quirks
    • From: [email protected]
  • [PATCH 4/15] x86-64: Calgary - introduce chipset specific ops
    • From: [email protected]
  • [PATCH 5/15] x86-64: Calgary - abstract how we find the iommu_table for a device
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [PATCH 5/15] x86-64: Calgary - abstract how we find the iommu_table for a device
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 5/15] x86-64: Calgary - abstract how we find the iommu_table for a device
    • From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] stop x86 ->sysdata abuse; introduce pci_sysdata
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] [RESEND] ext[34] orphan list check on destroy_inode
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] ext[34] orphan list check on destroy_inode
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] stop x86 ->sysdata abuse; introduce pci_sysdata
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] stop x86 ->sysdata abuse; introduce pci_sysdata
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]