jschopp wrote:
>> This version brings a host of changes to cure false positives and
>> bugs detected on patches submitted to lkml and -mm. It also brings
>> a number of new tests in response to reviews, of particular note:
>>
>> - catch use of volatile
>> - allow deprecated functions to be listed in
>> feature-removal-schedule.txt
>> - warn about #ifdef's in c files
>
>
> I think the design philosophy of the style checker should be to err on
> the side of being quiet. It shouldn't report things that aren't
> problems. There are plenty of valid uses of #ifdefs in c files.
> #ifdefs may be abused often. If we start bothering every author that
> uses #ifdefs with an annoying note it detracts from the usefulness of
> our tool.
>
> If we really want to complain about #ifdefs we should add a flag to the
> script so it isn't a default. -potential or something. We could put
> all the "this often is an error" type warnings under it.
>
> The rest of the patch looks fine.
For now then we'll put the ifdef checks on ice until we get a better
idea of the "rules" if we ever do.
-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
