From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:11:56 +0200
> > > I just want to win the "who's laziest?" league. It would take me
> > > about 5 minutes to get the netdev tree and test compile the change.
> > > Of which 5 seconds would be actually updating the patch. I was
> > > thought it was OK to pass that 5 seconds worth of hard work to you in
> > > order to save the rest ;)
> >
> > That tradeoff is fine, if, in return you'll do the rest of the
> > networking subsystem maintainership work I need to to. :-)
>
> Well, I _did_ save you quite a bit of time by tracking down these
> bugs. That 5 sec of dedication in exchange would have really made me
> feel good ;(
The only reason I can process as many patches as I can every day is
that I depend upon the end-nodes (that's you) doing most of the
time intensive work so that I can concentrate on reviewing patches
for correctness and proper implementation.
In any event, thanks for respinning the patch, it's late here so
I'll review it tomorrow.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
