Re: [PATCH/RFC] signal races/bugs, losing TIF_SIGPENDING and other woes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 23:09 -0700, Nicholas Miell wrote:
> signalfd() doesn't deliver thread-targeted signals to the wrong
> threads,
> does it?
> 
> Hmm.
> 
> It looks like reading from a signalfd will give you either
> process-global signals or the thread-specific signals that are
> targeted
> towards the thread that originally created the signalfd (regardless of
> which thread actually calls read()).
> 
> Which is weird, to say the least. Definitely needs to be noted in the
> man page, which doesn't seem to exist yet.
> 
> Is there a reason why signalfd() doesn't behave like regular signals
> in
> this regard? 

It's worse than that ... by being able to call dequeue_signal from the
contxt of another thread than the one dequeuing from.

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux