On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:43:51AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Jun 4 2007 10:27, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>> Seconded. All my code contains the goto label in the first column.
> >>>
> >>> IMO any other goto label indentation is silly, because it obscures the
> >>> goto label within the code block.
> >> I would have to disagree with this. IMNSHO, a goto label is like a case
> >> label, and they should be treated the same way.
> >
> > But gotos are special. ("Evil" minus the "it's good for unrolling in case of an
> > error" case).
> >
>
> So?
>
> You still want them to be associated with the level the bailout happens at.
A matter of opinion :) I tend to think goto is special enough to
warrant column 1 unconditionally. It is special, so it draws additional
attention over and above case labels.
I and others have been tripped up when programmers "hide" goto
statements among regular statements.
IMO goto warrants a big flashing "notice me" sign.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
