Re: [bug] very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av()

On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Paul Moore wrote:

> Okay, for some reason I thought someone had found a way to make 
> RCU "preemptable" through the real-time work, maybe I'm just confused 
> again :)

It is preemptible in the RT kernel, but as Ingo points out, nothing should 
be even trying to do something for 130ms in the kernel.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [bug] very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av()
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [bug] very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av()
    • From: Paul Moore <[email protected]>
  • Re: [bug] very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av()
    • From: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
  • Re: [bug] very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av()
    • From: Paul Moore <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Intel-IOMMU 01/10] DMAR detection and parsing logic
• Next by Date: Re: [Intel-IOMMU 02/10] Library routines for handling pre-allocated pool of objects
• Previous by thread: Re: [bug] very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av()
• Next by thread: Re: [bug] very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]