Re: [-mm patch] the ASYNC_* options shouldn't be user visible

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:25:02AM -0700, Williams, Dan J wrote:
> 
> Herbert can I move async_tx under crypto since the engines I am working
> with have support for algorithms like CRC32C and Galois Field Multiply
> (raid6 p+q)?

Sure that's fine by me.  Although as Adrian said it's probably better
to use something other than alphabetical order :)

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • RE: [-mm patch] the ASYNC_* options shouldn't be user visible
    • From: "Williams, Dan J" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: use iret directly where possible
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] PM: Disable usermode helper before hibernation and suspend
• Previous by thread: RE: [-mm patch] the ASYNC_* options shouldn't be user visible
• Next by thread: [PATCH] potential parse error in ifdef part 3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]