Re: [-mm patch] the ASYNC_* options shouldn't be user visible

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:25:02AM -0700, Williams, Dan J wrote:
> 
> Herbert can I move async_tx under crypto since the engines I am working
> with have support for algorithms like CRC32C and Galois Field Multiply
> (raid6 p+q)?

Sure that's fine by me.  Although as Adrian said it's probably better
to use something other than alphabetical order :)

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- RE: [-mm patch] the ASYNC_* options shouldn't be user visible
  - From: "Williams, Dan J" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: use iret directly where possible
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] PM: Disable usermode helper before hibernation and suspend
Previous by thread: RE: [-mm patch] the ASYNC_* options shouldn't be user visible
Next by thread: [PATCH] potential parse error in ifdef part 3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]