On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:56:46PM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 6/4/07, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote:
>...
>> The zlib code isn't kernel style and is arguably bloated, perhaps we
>> should remove that?
>
> I don't know - I don't use zlib.
> We can make LZO cleaner and perhaps faster. This will be good.
>...
"cleaner" = much harder to upgrade to new upstream LZO versions -> bad
"perhaps faster" = different from the well-known original code and
might again contain new bugs -> bad
"perhaps faster" = if we fork LZO and actually get it faster, all the
other LZO users will not benefit -> bad
zlib and LZO are special because they are maintained userspace code
imported into the kernel.
> Regards,
> Nitin
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
