Re: __get_free_pages: can GFP_DMA omit GFP_KERNEL and GFP_ATOMIC?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

> all right, then some of those __get_free_pages() calls would translate
> to calls of the form __get_dma_pages(0, ...) -- is that what you're
> saying?  or would it be equivalent and preferable to put GFP_ATOMIC in
> there just so it looks not so weird?

Put GFP_ATOMIC in there so that it does not look weird.

GFP_ATOMIC & ~__GFP_HIGH == GFP_NOWAIT

So these should have GFP_NOWAIT as far as I can tell?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux