On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote: > You add conditional branches on very hot spots. Keep BS for the ones you argue usually, and that are not able to reply. You *still* two bitmaps, because allocation spaces are far apart. So the "if" will still be there. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core
- From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core
- References:
- [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core
- From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core
- From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core
- From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/2] serverworks: always tune CSB6
- Next by Date: [PATCH 5/8] RSS container core
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core
- Index(es):
 |