Hi!
> > > They are already.
> >
> > ...but will that place still be safe when we use other version of
> > kernel?
>
> They'll be in the image too, won't they? Failing that, the information
> could be stored in the image header.
>
> > Anyway, pagedirs are on the safe place, right? That means that we
> > swsusp should no longer clash with page allocation debugging...
>
> You mean DEBUG_PAGEALLOC? That can be overcome easily - I have code in
> current Suspend2 that works with DEBUG_PAGEALLOC. I handle the page
> fault, mapping the page and setting a flag in the fault handler to tell
> the atomic copy code to unmap the page again once it has been copied.
I meant debug_pagealloc, but no, I do not think we want to make page
fault handler more complex. Switching to 1:1 mapping tables should be
enough.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
