On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Tear wrote:
> >
> > Wouldn't this also disable the IOAPIC in the (working) ACPI+IOAPIC case?
>
> Yes, it would. However, I wanted to make my addition
> to the kernel generic so that other people with
> problematic IO-APIC implementations can blacklist
> their systems without checking whether ACPI is enabled
> or not.
But that's just wrong. First off, all distro kernels come with ACPI on, so
the thing you're fixing is really just for somebody who compiles his own
kernel in a particular (and unusual/strange) configuration, and you're
making it _worse_ for everybody else.
And you're blacklisting it without even understaning _what_ is wrong. I
really think we should figure that part out first,
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
