Re: SLUB: Return ZERO_SIZE_PTR for kmalloc(0)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > +	 * The behavior for zero sized allocs changes. We no longer
> > > +	 * allocate memory but return ZERO_SIZE_PTR.
> > > +	 * WARN so that people can review and fix their code.
> > 
> > I don't see why people have so much opposition to zero-size memory 
> > allocations. There's all sorts of situations where you want a resizeable 
> > array that may have zero objects, especially in these days of 
> > hotpluggability.
> 
> In case you have not read the description to the end: This patch does 
> exactly what you want and legitimizes zero size object use. The warning 
> will be remove before 2.6.22 is released.

Ah, sorry then. I just saw this, and remembered a rather contrary 
discussion about it quite a time ago. Excellent then.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux