Lee Revell wrote:
> On 6/1/07, Matthew Fredrickson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> is it acceptable (although
>> not nice) to simply fix it this way, by disabling irqs while it loads
>> the firmware?
>>
>
> I would say to just disable IRQs while loading firmware. Almost every
> server I maintain has some vendor driver which generates a "many lost
> ticks!" message on load. As long as it's only done at module load
> time it should be fine.
>
> Of course the best solution is to just get the driver into mainline.
>
Disable interrupts for 5-10 seconds (see OP)? You're nuts.
That might be only a minor disaster on an SMP system, assuming IRQ
balancing sends them elsewhere, but on a uniprocessor system you're
effectively shooting the machine in the head.
It should be possible to streamline the code to not hog the stack that way.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
