Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:

"Scott Preece" <[email protected]> writes:

> This is a question worth answering - is it rude to ack/nak a patch if
> you're not a maintainer or otherwise known-to-be-trusted, or is it OK
> for anyone to express an opinion? Andrew's patch text seems to imply
> that it's generally OK.

Every pair of eyes (or a single one) looking at the patch in question
is a good thing. I can't imagine why would one want to look at the
code if he/she can't ack or nak or otherwise comment it.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:
    • From: "John Anthony Kazos Jr." <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:
    • From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:
    • From: "Scott Preece" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: SELECT() returns 1 But FIONREAD says (Input/output error)
• Next by Date: Re: [2.6.22-rc3][ACPI?] Resume from s2r doesn't work.
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]