Re: [PATCH] x86: Document the hotplug code is incompatible with x86 irq handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[Removed the Zwane's address from the CC list, because I get rejects from it]

On Friday, 1 June 2007 22:29, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Very well, but could you _please_ give us some time to do this?
> >
> > We know of the problem now and will work to fix it, but it's not _that_ easy.
> >
> > In fact, we also rely on the CPU hotplug's code that takes tasks away from the
> > offlined CPUs (and does the opposite with respect to the onlined CPUs), so
> > we just can't get rid of the CPU hotplug _right_ _now_.
> 
> Sure.  My primary point was to document this, and get things moving if
> possible to fix it.  This patch is 2.6.23 at the earliest, so there is
> some time to work on it even on the most optimistic merge schedule.
> 
> I just don't want to be complacent and let this problem sit undetected
> in back corner any more.

So, can you advise what we can do to get the "nonboot" CPUs out of the picture
during a suspend/hibernation?

Greetings,
Rafael
 

-- 
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux