On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:22:02PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:02:00PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:30:46PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > > + sym = sym_lookup("DEVEL_KERNEL", 0);
> > > > + sym->type = S_BOOLEAN;
> > > > + sym->flags |= SYMBOL_AUTO;
> > > > + p = getenv("DEVEL_KERNEL");
> > > > + if (p && atoi(p))
> > > > + sym_add_default(sym, "y");
> > > > + else
> > > > + sym_add_default(sym, "n");
> > > > +
> > >
> > > sym_set_tristate_value(sym, yes);
> > > else
> > > sym_set_tristate_value(sym, no);
> > >
> > > should do the trick (untested).
> >
> > Odd. What's the third state ? Undefined?
> no, mod, yes
> Representing: no, module, yes as the three config choices.
Now I'm even more puzzled. Why would 'DEVEL_KERNEL' need
to be modular ?
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
