Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: new exception handling (hotplug, NCQ framework)

[Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>]

Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Jeff Garzik schrieb:
> > Below is a refresh of my on-going effort to convert sata_mv to the new
> > exception handling framework.  sata_mv is one of the last hold-outs, and
> > its old-EH implementation blocks new features like hotplug and NCQ.
> >
> > It works for me on the one 50xx and one 60xx card I tested it on, but
> > other testers reported regressions, which is why it is not yet upstream.
>
> Hi,
>
> If I'm correct, this patch won't make to 2.6.22, and the first possible 
> inclusion would be 2.6.23?

Correct... if that.  No guarantee it will make 2.6.23 either, since it 
is low priority :(


> Could you summarize what other regressions were reported? I can't find 
> much information about sata_mv regressiobs on linux-ide list (at least 
> when looking at the subjects: lots of patches from you, and two reports 
> from me).

Dave Dillow and dean gaudet responded with reports that the 
BUG_ON/WARN_ON traps in would trigger:

WARNING: at drivers/ata/sata_mv.c:1287 mv_qc_issue()
	and
WARNING: at drivers/ata/sata_mv.c:1333 mv_get_crpb_status()

which leads me to think that my sata_mv new-EH patches are accidentally 
turning on NCQ mode.

I have a feeling that I will be able to reproduce this once I attach an 
NCQ-capable drive and re-test on my own systems, but again, haven't 
found the time :/

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/