> It's not clear to me why either of those things are necessary. An > example please? It's certainly possible that a global flag would need to be tested more than once. I guess it would work if a symbol is associated with a single definition. e.g. if there is a DEFINE_COND_CALL() somewhere and the individual cond calls reference it. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table
- References:
- [patch 0/9] Conditional Calls - for 2.6.22-rc2-mm1
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- [patch 0/9] Conditional Calls - for 2.6.22-rc2-mm1
- Prev by Date: Re: [AppArmor 01/41] Pass struct vfsmount to the inode_create LSM hook
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table
- Index(es):