Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385

On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:05:54PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 May 2007, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > 
> > > I used the sn2_defconfig in the tree :)
> > 
> > That is a static kernel build. Ideal for that kind of bug.
> Quite the opposite.

I thought that a static kernel build would throw out the __exit sections? 
So it should trigger the bug?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
    • From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
    • From: "Luck, Tony" <[email protected]>
  • Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
    • From: Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]>
  • Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
    • From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Input: document the proper usage of EV_KEY and KEY_UNKNOWN
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc3-mm1 - page_mkwrite() breakage
• Previous by thread: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
• Next by thread: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]