Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385

On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:05:54PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 May 2007, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > 
> > > I used the sn2_defconfig in the tree :)
> > 
> > That is a static kernel build. Ideal for that kind of bug.
> Quite the opposite.

I thought that a static kernel build would throw out the __exit sections? 
So it should trigger the bug?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
  - From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>

References:
- RE: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
  - From: "Luck, Tony" <[email protected]>
- Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
  - From: Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]>
- Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
  - From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Input: document the proper usage of EV_KEY and KEY_UNKNOWN
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc3-mm1 - page_mkwrite() breakage
Previous by thread: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
Next by thread: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]