Mark Lord wrote:
Some cards may perform better when their "memory" interface is used instead of the "I/O" interface, or vice-versa. I'm not sure whichof the two methods was selected by libata (probably the "memory" interface).
I am very CF-ignorant. How does libata select a memory or I/O interface on a CF device?
Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Compact Flash performance...
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: Compact Flash performance...
- References:
- Compact Flash performance...
- From: "Daniel J Blueman" <[email protected]>
- Re: Compact Flash performance...
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: Compact Flash performance...
- From: "Daniel J Blueman" <[email protected]>
- Re: Compact Flash performance...
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: Compact Flash performance...
- From: "Daniel J Blueman" <[email protected]>
- Re: Compact Flash performance...
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: Compact Flash performance...
- From: "Daniel J Blueman" <[email protected]>
- Re: Compact Flash performance...
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Compact Flash performance...
- Prev by Date: Re: Compact Flash performance...
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] use mutex instead of semaphore in tty_io.c
- Previous by thread: Re: Compact Flash performance...
- Next by thread: Re: Compact Flash performance...
- Index(es):
 |