> I see your point, but there is a level of control on the branch I would
> lack by doing so: the ability to put the call in either the if or else
> branch. It is an optimization on i386.
What does it optimize exactly?
> Also, I live in the expectation that, someday, the gcc guys will be nice
> enough to add some kind of support for a nop-based jump that would
> require code patching to put a jump instead. If it ever happens, my
> macro could evolve into this for newer compiler versions, which I could
> not do with the if() statement you are proposing.
If that ever happens we couldn't use it anyways because Linux still
has to support old compilers for a long time. And when those are dropped the
code could be updated.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
