Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq (v2)

On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:29:43AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andi Kleen <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > On Thursday 31 May 2007 13:34:21 Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> 
> >> On x86_64 kernel, level triggered irq migration gets initiated in the context
> >> of that interrupt(after executing the irq handler) and following steps are
> >> followed to do the irq migration.
> >
> > What's the confidence level in the patch? Is it a .22 candidate?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> I just ran it for a little while and nothing fell over, and level
> triggered irqs continued to migrate.  So it's not horribly broken.
> 
> Outside of implementation errors the worst case that can happen with
> this code is the current behavior, with a small slow down.
> 
> So since I can not reproduce the original problem I would appreciate
> an eyeball or two more just to make certain I reimplemented this
> correctly and didn't do anything stupid.   But I don't expect anything
> to be found.  The code is pretty straight forward.

Yes. We want this to get included in .22. We did extensive testing with
our patch before.  We will also do more tests with this version, however.

thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] x86_64 irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq (v2)
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq (v2)
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq (v2)
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• Prev by Date: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: Document the hotplug code is incompatible with x86 irq handling
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq (v2)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq (v2)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]